Traditions configuration - Revision history

StevenEgan at 14:54, 21 May 2025

2025-05-21T14:54:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 21 May 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Have to set up connection with individual.		Have to set up connection with individual.

	What would you want a clinician to understand about your tradition which will make you feel respected. What could they read to help them talk to you.		What would you want a clinician to understand about your tradition which will make you feel respected. What could they read to help them talk to you. In the context of emergent phenomena - list of phenomena - these are some of the ways we think about this. What would want a clinician to have an appreciation of. Please feel free to include aspects of:

	'''Template''' will need to include:		'''Template''' will need to include:

StevenEgan: Daniel's update

2025-05-21T14:30:06Z

Daniel's update

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 21 May 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	'''Front end'''		'''Front end'''


			Template should be much more invitational, rather than analytical. Rorschach-y rather than structured. Make them feel brought in and respected.

			Have to set up connection with individual.

			What would you want a clinician to understand about your tradition which will make you feel respected. What could they read to help them talk to you.

	'''Template''' will need to include:		'''Template''' will need to include:

	* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [~~Is this really needed or do we link~~ to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]		* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Link to wikipedia which has all this info and more, if needed] (This is not
	* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, psychosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?) (Olivier to expand this out with categories)		* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, psychosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?) (Olivier to expand this out with categories) They can follow DSM if they wish, but don't have to. Views on experiences.
	* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''		* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).

StevenEgan at 12:49, 21 May 2025

2025-05-21T12:49:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 21 May 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:

	* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]		* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]
	* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, psychosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?)		* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, psychosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?) (Olivier to expand this out with categories)
	* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''		* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).

StevenEgan at 14:41, 3 March 2025

2025-03-03T14:41:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 3 March 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	'''Namespace configuration''' will need to include:		'''Namespace configuration''' will need to include:

	Permissions		'''Permissions'''

			Create page - yes

			Edit - no

			Comment - no

			'''Moderation'''

			Achieved through Template and orientation material

	~~Moderation~~

OlivierSandilands at 15:02, 13 February 2025

2025-02-13T15:02:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 13 February 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]		* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]
	* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, ~~pscyhosis~~, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?)		* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, psychosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?)
	* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''		* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).

OlivierSandilands at 16:52, 22 January 2025

2025-01-22T16:52:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 22 January 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).
	**# Ontology		**# Ontology
	*# Nature of Reality~~, Mind, and Being in General~~		*# Nature of Reality
	# Substantialist views		# Substantialist views
	#* Monisms		#* Monisms
Line 31:		Line 31:
	#* Non-foundationalist non-substantialism — Thinkers and traditions that hold there is no intrinsic ultimate substance nor a specific ultimate origin or foundation to phenomena, and that such concepts are in fact mistaken. Meister Eckhart seemed close to this, Parmenides as well, Buddhist philosophy of dependent origination (inter-being) and Emptiness (e.g. Madhyamika philosophy), perhaps Nietzsche, William James, Rob Burbea, etc.		#* Non-foundationalist non-substantialism — Thinkers and traditions that hold there is no intrinsic ultimate substance nor a specific ultimate origin or foundation to phenomena, and that such concepts are in fact mistaken. Meister Eckhart seemed close to this, Parmenides as well, Buddhist philosophy of dependent origination (inter-being) and Emptiness (e.g. Madhyamika philosophy), perhaps Nietzsche, William James, Rob Burbea, etc.
	# Agnosticism		# Agnosticism
	**# Real beings? Categories of beings? Order of beings?		*# Real beings? Categories of beings? Order of beings?
	*# Deity/Deities		# Deity/Deities, pantheon
	# Monotheism, Polytheism, Pantheism, Deism, Panentheism, Atheism, etc.		#* Monotheism, Polytheism, Pantheism, Deism, Panentheism, Atheism, etc.
	# Creator God ?		#* Creator God ?
	# Hierarchy of beings, ex : Quantum Bayesianism; String Theory; Periodic Table of the Elements; Celestial hierarchies (Pseudo-Dionysius) ; Greek Pantheon (Dodecatheism) ; The Great Chain of Being; etc.		# Hierarchy of beings, ex : Quantum Bayesianism; String Theory; Periodic Table of the Elements; Celestial hierarchies (Pseudo-Dionysius) ; Greek Pantheon (Dodecatheism) ; The Great Chain of Being; etc.
	# True Nature of Ultimate Being - ex : Brahman; Śūnyatā		# True Nature of Ultimate Being - ex : Brahman; Śūnyatā

OlivierSandilands at 16:46, 22 January 2025

2025-01-22T16:46:18Z

Show changes

OlivierSandilands at 16:44, 22 January 2025

2025-01-22T16:44:19Z

Show changes

OlivierSandilands at 16:39, 22 January 2025

2025-01-22T16:39:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 22 January 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	'''Template''' will need to include:		'''Template''' will need to include:

	* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) > Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?)''		* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) >'' [Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?]
	* ''Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise.''		* ''[''The following is the core element of the traditional template''] Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise'' > Structure this according to the DSM stuff! DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around the categories e.g. hallucination, pscyhosis, etc. What would you say applies to this exemption according to your tradition?)
	* ''Key concepts;''
	* ''Practices, challenges, and managing them;''
	* ''Ethics;''
	* ''Fundamental Ontology (~~ies)''~~
	* ''Soteriological doctrine what saves you and what are you being saved from''
	** Soteriology - This is related to but not the ~~same as Metaphysics. What is Salvation ? How is it attained ? What is it we need to be saved from?~~ e.g.~~: Experiential knowledge (Buddhism)~~, ~~Knowledge (Gnosticism)~~, ~~Faith and Devotion (Catholicism), Different possibilities (Hinduism sees Jñana, Karma, Bhakti, as different but equally valid paths~~ to ~~salvation~~).
	* ''Preferred linguistics woven through the document''
	* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''		* ''Beliefs and views (what are you?) nature of experience, consciousness, humans''
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).
Line 52:		Line 45:
	*# Laws ruling the Cosmos — ex : God’s Will; Karma		*# Laws ruling the Cosmos — ex : God’s Will; Karma
	# Man's place in the Cosmos;		# Man's place in the Cosmos;
	# Status and Nature of individual agency - ex : Free Will		# Status and Nature of individual agency - ex : Free Will
	* ''Epistemics (where does the knowledge come from? divine revelation/textual/etc.)''		* ''Epistemics (where does the knowledge come from? divine revelation/textual/etc.)''
	*# Epistemology —Whence does valid knowledge/perception/cognition arise ?		*# Epistemology —Whence does valid knowledge/perception/cognition arise ?
Line 58:		Line 51:
	# Logic — E.g. Inference, Comparison and analogy, Self-evidence/Apodicticity, Postulation, derivation - Induction, Truth and Justification, Valid Cognition		# Logic — E.g. Inference, Comparison and analogy, Self-evidence/Apodicticity, Postulation, derivation - Induction, Truth and Justification, Valid Cognition
	# Theory of mind, knower/known		# Theory of mind, knower/known
	*~~DSM 5 categories for religious exemption (structure questions around~~ the ~~categories~~ e.g. ~~hallucination~~, ~~pscyhosis~~, ~~etc~~. ~~What would you say applies to~~ this ~~exemption according to your tradition~~?)		* ''Soteriological doctrine what saves you and what are you being saved from''
			** Soteriology - This is related to but not the same as Metaphysics. What is Salvation ? How is it attained ? What is it we need to be saved from? e.g.: Experiential knowledge (Buddhism), Knowledge (Gnosticism), Faith and Devotion (Catholicism), Different possibilities (Hinduism sees Jñana, Karma, Bhakti, as different but equally valid paths to salvation).
			* ''Preferred linguistics and key concepts woven through the document (Olivier notes: I've begun something like this in Zenkit in the [https://base.zenkit.com/c/MvVVa4gC_2/lexicon Lexicon] collection which can be integrated)''
			*
			* [Possible additional elements]
			** ''Authority''
			*** ''Scriptural''
			*** ''Temporal - Organized Religion ? Clergy ? Hierarchies ?''
			** ''Rituals and Practices (e.g. Rituals of Devotion, Dietary practices, Meditative practices);''
			** ''Religious Institutions and Affiliation''
			** ''Modes of Living, Codes and Precepts (ex : Priesthood, Monasticism, Laity)''
			** ''Ethical principles;''

	'''Infoboxes''' will need to include:		'''Infoboxes''' will need to include:

OlivierSandilands at 16:31, 22 January 2025

2025-01-22T16:31:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 22 January 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	'''Template''' will need to include:		'''Template''' will need to include:

	* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (~~infobox_~~''		* ''Basic demographics; (numbers of people in tradition) - don't highlight this (infobox) > Is this really needed or do we link to wikipedia which has all this info and more?)''
	* ''Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise.''		* ''Views on emergence in general,'' ''typologies of EPEEs, normal VS abnormal, and developmental models;'' ''i.e. what is ok and what is not, how do you deal with them when they arise.''
	* ''Key concepts;''		* ''Key concepts;''

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 22 January 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).		** Beliefs, Views, Metaphysics — e.g. reality, substance, causality, properties, relations, categories of beings, universals, particulars, space, time, freedom, …, these are some of the topic of metaphysics (Sjösdedt-Hughes, 2023).
	**# Ontology		**# Ontology
	*# Nature of Reality~~, Mind, and Being in General~~		*# Nature of Reality
	# Substantialist views		# Substantialist views
	#* Monisms		#* Monisms
Line 31:		Line 31:
	#* Non-foundationalist non-substantialism — Thinkers and traditions that hold there is no intrinsic ultimate substance nor a specific ultimate origin or foundation to phenomena, and that such concepts are in fact mistaken. Meister Eckhart seemed close to this, Parmenides as well, Buddhist philosophy of dependent origination (inter-being) and Emptiness (e.g. Madhyamika philosophy), perhaps Nietzsche, William James, Rob Burbea, etc.		#* Non-foundationalist non-substantialism — Thinkers and traditions that hold there is no intrinsic ultimate substance nor a specific ultimate origin or foundation to phenomena, and that such concepts are in fact mistaken. Meister Eckhart seemed close to this, Parmenides as well, Buddhist philosophy of dependent origination (inter-being) and Emptiness (e.g. Madhyamika philosophy), perhaps Nietzsche, William James, Rob Burbea, etc.
	# Agnosticism		# Agnosticism
	**# Real beings? Categories of beings? Order of beings?		*# Real beings? Categories of beings? Order of beings?
	*# Deity/Deities		# Deity/Deities, pantheon
	# Monotheism, Polytheism, Pantheism, Deism, Panentheism, Atheism, etc.		#* Monotheism, Polytheism, Pantheism, Deism, Panentheism, Atheism, etc.
	# Creator God ?		#* Creator God ?
	# Hierarchy of beings, ex : Quantum Bayesianism; String Theory; Periodic Table of the Elements; Celestial hierarchies (Pseudo-Dionysius) ; Greek Pantheon (Dodecatheism) ; The Great Chain of Being; etc.		# Hierarchy of beings, ex : Quantum Bayesianism; String Theory; Periodic Table of the Elements; Celestial hierarchies (Pseudo-Dionysius) ; Greek Pantheon (Dodecatheism) ; The Great Chain of Being; etc.
	# True Nature of Ultimate Being - ex : Brahman; Śūnyatā		# True Nature of Ultimate Being - ex : Brahman; Śūnyatā